Been a stretch since I've done a thinky post. These days I've been pondering differences in how we deal with challenges in relationship. My pondering comes from my relationship, situations close friends are in and ponderings on relationship challenge styles with the men I was remembering in
this post.
I have said many times that I believe we take ourselves wherever we go. What I mean by that is that I think how we operate in one relationship (whether with ourselves, our kids, our work, our primary love relationship or whatever) is how we operate in all our relationships.
I have noticed a few basic patterns:
1) There are those who do not want to address strong emotions. They withdraw, walk away, leave the person with strong emotions alone. I have decided to fondly call them The Runners. No insult implied. Simply is what it is.
2) There are those who address strong emotional issues straight on in the moment. Often, since buttons are in the height of tweak, communication and working with the challenges can get...intense.
3) There are those who address strong emotional issues straight on but after they've had some time to process theirs first to find out what's going on at a deeper level for them. When they figure themselves out, they are able to come to the discussion with information that is useful for all concerned.
Shit happens. Whenever two people know each other for any length of time, there is opportunity for challenge. Buttons get tweaked, feelings hurt. I personally prefer the last mode because I think that the mode in which things can get most quickly resolved. Intimacy is increased a hundredfold. This, for me, is the place of relationship magic at its highest expression: where hurts and buttons are transmuted to intense closeness as we both move beyond ourselves into Love.
I, myself, have experienced all three modes.
I prefer to address things straight on. I am happy to say I generally operate in the third mode these days. Being human (hate being imperfect) there are times core buttons get tweaked and I get lost in the second. But only temporarily. I feel like I've only
really lost myself a three times in the past six years. All three times I was highly stressed, highly charged. But generally speaking, not much pushes my buttons. If they are tweaked, I speak my nonblamey Truth. If I am heard, energy is released and I move on.
One of the men I wrote about in the above mentioned post always operated in the second mode. He used to get really angry and share. It was often difficult wading our way through his issues and it got very uncomfortable from time to time. We would spend hours as he was relentless in our processing. Lots. Of. Work. However, I will happily embrace that mode over The Runners
any day.
My experience with runners is that the relationship gets built on lies and withholds out of necessity. Every time I've been in relationship with someone who does not address things, I get the message loud and clear that I am not to tell when my feelings are hurt. Not to question unsettling or inconsistent statements. Not to disclose my deepest self. Because if I do, the person will leave. I am only acceptable when happy, balanced and "fun." If I get off balance, hurt, upset, then I am unlovable and will be left behind.
My experience is that people who operate in this mode don't communicate their departure or involve the other person in their process in any way. They simply ignore or disappear when anyone expresses anything they deem a stronger or uncomfortable emotion. If I'm feeling "analytic" I can point to theories that suggest this is controlling, passive/aggressive behavior of the highest order. What better way to control a conversation than leave it, quiet the person, abandon? There is no need to go deeper, no need to look within or at mirrors or parts of the co-creation. Opportunity for
any intimate inner work is denied because the door shuts.
The emotional person is left sitting with nowhere to go but inward. The only thing they can do is bury or try to work within themselves to find balance (hard work). Burying can only go on for so long before they are left with only rage or distance/disengagement to protect themselves.
I have known a number of people who won't address strong feelings. Each of these people has told me that they think anger a "toxic" emotion. I have also experienced that when they finally do get angry they explode and get cruel, enraged...out of control with their rage. This frightens them. If they've caught themselves before the get lost in their anger then bury and run, when they deem it time to return they act like nothing has happened. Everyone is just supposed to take up from the point before the upset. I find it surreal.
The person I am closest to who deals with relationship upsets by avoidance is my youngest daughter. I guess I should say that she used to be a runner. It's been awhile since we've had problems. She isn't around and she's changed lots so maybe this isn't her way any more. Just before she left, she started to deal more in the second mode. Before that our relationship was constant, underlying, ongoing tension because nothing ever got resolved. It was only when she finally allowed her anger that we started to heal our relationship. But our history started me asking a number of questions:
I notice that all the runner people I've known interpret much stronger emotion in the other person that is actually there. I find that very interesting. Could it be that what they are seeing/interpreting is actually their own strong, buried emotions in the other?...that anything other than light and love is perceived as this HUGE proooooooblem and "drama." When, actually, what's really going on is that they are the ones who are creating more drama because they won't allow their emotions to flow?
Why does anger terrify them? Why do they judge it so?
Do they push away anger because they think if they express it they won't be loved any more?
Do they not understand their denial of this basic human emotion doesn't mean it's not in them?
Don't they see that their quiet screams just as loudly as any yelling?
Do they not understand that those around them get frantic to try and be seen/heard...their emotions acknowledged? That the more they withdraw, the louder the other has to be to match that? The relationships I've known where this mode dominates have shut down sexually and one or the other partner gets really angry. Often one or the other partner starts to cheat. Or they drink to bury the pain of being silenced.
Do they not understand that by not addressing an issue, it stays? But that if they do it dissolves? I remember one time my youngest was talking about how her sister and I had this huge fight...and how awful it was, how destructive and unhealthy. I didn't remember it. When I asked the sister, she had no memory of it, either. That said lots to me.
Dealing with stronger emotions can get testy, especially when both people's buttons get pushed. Even when we try not to, we generally get together with those who perfectly mirror our biggest woundings. Being in relationship of any length means that some day there is a good likelihood of upset. Being with someone we really care about almost guarantees it.
If both parties can feel and stay and listen, things might get strong...maybe even scary... for a short bit. But that short time passes quickly because that is the nature of emotions which are allowed to flow.
Things can only heal when brought to the light and dealt with. Burying dooms people to repeat their pattern in every important relationship until they turn and look their demons in the face...hopefully with someone they love who will help them shine a light on what's simply another emotion. And if they do, they no longer have to run. That even in their anger they can be loved.